ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html   [plain text]


<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">

<html>

<head>

<title>Postfix Address Verification </title>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">

</head>

<body>

<h1><img src="postfix-logo.jpg" width="203" height="98" ALT="">Postfix Address Verification Howto</h1>

<hr>

<h2>WARNING </h2>

<p> Recipient address verification may cause an increased load on
down-stream servers in the case of a dictionary attack or a flood
of backscatter bounces. Sender address verification may cause your
site to be blacklisted by some providers.  See also the "<a
href="#limitations">Limitations</a>" section below for more.  </p>

<h2><a name="summary">What Postfix address verification can do for you</a></h2>

<p> Address verification is a feature that allows the Postfix SMTP
server to block a sender (MAIL FROM) or recipient (RCPT TO) address
until the address has been verified to be deliverable.  </p>

<p> The technique has obvious uses to reject junk mail
with an unreplyable sender address.  </p>

<p> The technique is also useful to block mail for undeliverable
recipients, for example on a mail relay host that does not have a
list of all the valid recipient addresses. This prevents undeliverable
junk mail from entering the queue, so that Postfix doesn't have to
waste resources trying to send MAILER-DAEMON messages back. </p>

<p> This feature is available in Postfix version 2.1 and later. </p>

<p> Topics covered in this document: </p>

<ul>

<li><a href="#how"> How address verification works</a>

<li><a href="#limitations">Limitations of address verification</a>

<li><a href="#recipient">Recipient address verification</a>

<li><a href="#forged_sender">Sender address verification for mail
from frequently forged domains</a>

<li><a href="#sender_always">Sender address verification for all
email</a>

<li><a href="#caching">Address verification database</a>

<li><a href="#dirty_secret">Managing the address verification
database</a>

<li><a href="#probe_routing">Controlling the routing of address
verification probes</a>

<li><a href="#forced_examples">Forced probe routing examples</a>

<li><a href="#forced_limitations">Limitations of forced probe routing</a>

</ul>

<h2><a name="how">How address verification works</a></h2>

<p> A Postfix MTA verifies a sender or recipient address by probing
the nearest
MTA for that address, without actually delivering mail. The nearest
MTA could be the Postfix MTA itself, or it could be a remote MTA
(SMTP
interruptus).  Probe messages are like normal mail, except that
they are never delivered, deferred or bounced; probe messages are
always discarded.  </p>

<blockquote>

<table border="0">

<tr>

    <td rowspan="2" colspan="5" align="center" valign="middle">
    &nbsp; </td>

    <td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="bottom"> <tt> -&gt; </tt>
    </td>

	<td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> probe<br>
	message </td>

    <td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> <tt> -&gt; </tt>
    </td>

	<td rowspan="3" bgcolor="#f0f0ff" align="center" valign="middle">
	Postfix<br> mail<br> queue </td>

</tr>

<tr> <td> </td> </tr>

<tr>

    <td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> Internet </td>

    <td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> <tt> -&gt; </tt>
    </td>

	<td rowspan="3" bgcolor="#f0f0ff" align="center" valign="middle">
	<a href="smtpd.8.html">Postfix<br> SMTP<br> server</a> </td>

    <td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> <tt> &lt;-&gt;
    </tt> </td>

	<td rowspan="3" bgcolor="#f0f0ff" align="center" valign="middle">
	<a href="verify.8.html">Postfix<br> verify<br> server</a>
	</td>

</tr>

<tr>

    <td rowspan="1" colspan="3"> </td>

    <td rowspan="1" align="center" valign="middle"> <tt> |</tt><br>
    <tt> v</tt> </td>

</tr>

<tr>

    <td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="top"> <tt> &lt;- </tt>
    </td>

	<td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> probe<br>
	status </td>

    <td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> <tt> &lt;- </tt>
    </td>

	<td rowspan="3" bgcolor="#f0f0ff" align="center" valign="middle">
	Postfix<br> delivery<br> agents </td>

    <td rowspan="3" align="left" valign="middle"> <tt>-&gt;</tt>
    Local<br> <tt>-&gt;</tt> Remote</td>

</tr>

<tr>

    <td rowspan="3" colspan="4" align="center" valign="middle">
    &nbsp; </td>

	<td rowspan="3" align="center" valign="middle"> <tt>
	^</tt><br> <tt> |</tt><br> <tt> v</tt> </td>

</tr>

<tr> <td> </td> </tr>

<tr> <td colspan="4"> &nbsp; </td> </tr>

<tr>

    <td colspan="4" align="center" valign="middle"> &nbsp; </td>

	<td bgcolor="#f0f0ff" align="center" valign="middle">
	Address<br> verification<br> database </td>

</tr>

</table>

</blockquote>

<p> With Postfix address verification turned on, normal mail will
suffer only a short delay of up to 6 seconds while an address is
being verified for the first time.  Once an address status is known,
the status is cached and Postfix replies immediately. </p>

<p> When verification takes too long the Postfix SMTP server defers
the sender or recipient address with a 450 reply. Normal mail
clients will connect again after some delay.  The address verification
delay is configurable with the main.cf address_verify_poll_count
and address_verify_poll_delay parameters.  See postconf(5) for
details. </p>

<h2><a name="limitations">Limitations of address verification</a></h2>

<ul>

<li> <p> When verifying a remote address, Postfix probes the nearest
MTA for that address, without actually delivering mail to it. If
the nearest MTA accepts the address, then Postfix assumes that the
address is deliverable. In reality, mail for a remote address can
bounce AFTER the nearest MTA accepts the recipient address, or AFTER
the nearest MTA accepts the message content. </p>

<li> <p> Some sites may blacklist you when you are probing them
too often (a probe is an SMTP session that does not deliver mail),
or when you are probing them too often for a non-existent address.
This is one reason why you should use sender address verification
sparingly, if at all, when your site receives lots of email.  </p>

<li> <p> Normally, address verification probe messages follow the
same path as regular mail.  However, some sites send mail to the
Internet via an intermediate relayhost; this breaks address
verification.  See below, section <a href="#probe_routing">"Controlling
the routing of address verification probes"</a>, for how to override
mail routing and for possible limitations when you have to do this.
</p>

<li> <p> Postfix assumes that an address is undeliverable when the
nearest MTA for the address rejects the probe, regardless of the
reason for rejection (client rejected, HELO rejected, MAIL FROM
rejected, etc.).  Thus, Postfix rejects an address when the nearest
MTA for that address rejects mail from your machine for any reason.
This is not a limitation, but it is mentioned here just in case
people believe that it is a limitation. </p>

<li> <p> Unfortunately, some sites do not reject
unknown addresses in reply to the RCPT TO command, but report a
delivery failure in response to end of DATA after a message is
transferred.  Postfix address verification does not work with such
sites. </p>

<li> <p> By default, Postfix probe messages have a sender address
"double-bounce@$myorigin" (with Postfix versions before 2.5, the
default
is "postmaster@$myorigin"). This is SAFE because the Postfix SMTP
server does not reject mail for this address. </p>

<p> You can change the probe sender address into the null address
("address_verify_sender
="). This is UNSAFE because address probes will fail with
mis-configured sites that reject MAIL FROM:  &lt;&gt;, while
probes from "double-bounce@$myorigin" would succeed. </p>

<li> <p> The downside of using a non-empty sender address is that
the address may end op on spammer mailing lists. Although Postfix
always discards mail to the double-bounce address, this still results
in wasted network bandwidth and server capacity.  To defeat
address harvesting, Postfix 2.9 and later support time-dependent
sender addresses when you specify a non-zero address_verify_sender_ttl
value.  </p>

</ul>

<h2><a name="recipient">Recipient address verification</a></h2>

<p> As mentioned earlier, recipient address verification is
useful to block mail for undeliverable recipients on a mail relay
host that does not have a list of all valid recipient addresses.
This can help to prevent the mail queue from filling up with
MAILER-DAEMON messages. </p>

<p> Recipient address verification is relatively straightforward
and there are no surprises. If a recipient probe fails, then Postfix
rejects mail for the recipient address.  If a recipient probe
succeeds, then Postfix accepts mail for the recipient address.
However, recipient address verification probes can increase the
load on down-stream MTAs when you're being flooded by backscatter
bounces, or when some spammer is mounting a dictionary attack. </p>

<p> By default, address verification results are saved in a <a
href="#caching">persistent database</a> (Postfix version 2.7 and
later; with earlier versions, specify the database in main.cf as
described later).  The persistent database helps to avoid probing
the same address repeatedly.  </p>

<blockquote>
<pre>
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
    smtpd_recipient_restrictions = 
        permit_mynetworks
        reject_unauth_destination
        ...
        reject_unknown_recipient_domain
        reject_unverified_recipient
        ...
    # Postfix 2.6 and later privacy feature.
    # unverified_recipient_reject_reason = Address lookup failed
</pre>
</blockquote>

<p> The "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" restriction blocks mail
for non-existent domains. Putting this before "reject_unverified_recipient"
avoids the overhead of generating unnecessary probe messages. </p>

<p> The unverified_recipient_reject_code parameter (default 450)
specifies the numerical Postfix SMTP server reply code when a
recipient address is known to
bounce.  Change this setting into 550 when you trust Postfix's
judgments. </p>

<p> The following features are available in Postfix 2.6 and later.
</p>

<p> The unverified_recipient_defer_code parameter (default 450)
specifies the numerical Postfix SMTP server reply code when a
recipient address probe fails with some temporary error. Some sites
insist on changing this into 250. NOTE: This change turns MX servers
into backscatter sources when the load is high.  </p>

<p> The unverified_recipient_reject_reason parameter (default:
empty) specifies fixed text that Postfix will send to remote SMTP
clients, instead of sending actual address verification details.
Do not specify the SMTP status code or enhanced status code.  </p>

<p> The unverified_recipient_tempfail_action parameter (default:
defer_if_permit) specifies the Postfix SMTP server action when a
recipient address verification probe fails with some temporary
error.  </p>

<h2><a name="forged_sender">Sender address verification for mail from frequently forged domains</a></h2>

<p> Only for very small sites, it is relatively safe to turn on
sender address verification for specific domains that often appear
in forged email.  </p>

<blockquote>
<pre>
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
    smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
    unverified_sender_reject_code = 550
    # Postfix 2.6 and later.
    # unverified_sender_defer_code = 250

    # Default setting for Postfix 2.7 and later.
    # Note 1: Be sure to read the "<a href="#caching">Caching</a>" section below!
    # Note 2: Avoid hash files here. Use btree instead.
    address_verify_map = btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify
 
/etc/postfix/sender_access:
    # Don't do this when you handle lots of email.
    aol.com     reject_unverified_sender
    hotmail.com reject_unverified_sender
    bigfoot.com reject_unverified_sender
    ... etcetera ...
</pre>
</blockquote>

<p> At some point in cyberspace/time, a list of frequently forged
MAIL FROM domains could be found at
http://www.monkeys.com/anti-spam/filtering/sender-domain-validate.in.  </p>

<p> NOTE: One of the first things you might want to do is to turn
on sender address verification for all your own domains. </p>

<h2><a name="sender_always">Sender address verification for all
email</a></h2>

<p> Unfortunately, sender address verification cannot simply be
turned on for all email - you are likely to lose legitimate mail
from mis-configured systems. You almost certainly will have to set
up white lists for specific addresses, or even for entire domains.
</p>

<p> To find out how sender address verification would affect your
mail, specify "warn_if_reject reject_unverified_sender" so that
you can see what mail would be blocked: </p>

<blockquote>
<pre>
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
    smtpd_sender_restrictions = 
        permit_mynetworks
        ... 
        check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
        reject_unknown_sender_domain
        warn_if_reject reject_unverified_sender 
        ...
    # Postfix 2.6 and later.
    # unverified_sender_reject_reason = Address verification failed

    # Default setting for Postfix 2.7 and later.
    # Note 1: Be sure to read the "<a href="#caching">Caching</a>" section below!
    # Note 2: Avoid hash files here. Use btree instead.
    address_verify_map = btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify
</pre>
</blockquote>

<p> This is also a good way to populate your cache with address
verification results before you start to actually reject mail. </p>

<p> The sender_access restriction is needed to whitelist domains
or addresses that are known to be OK.  Although Postfix will not
mark a known-to-be-good address as bad after a probe fails, it is
better to be safe than sorry. </p>

<p> NOTE: You will have to whitelist sites such as securityfocus.com
and other sites that operate mailing lists that use a different
sender address for each posting (VERP).  Such addresses pollute
the address verification cache quickly, and generate unnecessary
sender verification probes. </p>

<blockquote>
<pre>
/etc/postfix/sender_access
    securityfocus.com OK
    ...
</pre>
</blockquote>

<p> The "reject_unknown_sender_domain" restriction blocks mail from
non-existent domains. Putting this before "reject_unverified_sender"
avoids the overhead of generating unnecessary probe messages. </p>

<p> The unverified_sender_reject_code parameter (default 450)
specifies the numerical Postfix server reply code when a sender
address is known to
bounce.  Change this setting into 550 when you trust Postfix's
judgments. </p>

<p> The following features are available in Postfix 2.6 and later.
</p>

<p> The unverified_sender_defer_code parameter (default 450) specifies
the numerical Postfix SMTP server reply code when a sender address
verification probe fails with some temporary error. Specify a valid
2xx or 4xx code. </p>

<p> The unverified_sender_reject_reason parameter (default:
empty) specifies fixed text that Postfix will send to remote SMTP
clients, instead of sending actual addres verification details.
Do not specify the SMTP status code or enhanced status code.  </p>

<p> The unverified_sender_tempfail_action parameter (default:
defer_if_permit) specifies the Postfix SMTP server action when a
sender address verification probe fails with some temporary error.
</p>

<h2><a name="caching">Address verification database</a></h2>

<p> To improve performance, the Postfix verify(8) daemon can save
address verification results to a persistent database. This is
enabled by default with Postfix 2.7 and later.  The
address_verify_map (NOTE: singular) configuration parameter specifies
persistent storage for sender or recipient address verification
results.  If you specify an empty value, all address verification
results are lost after "postfix reload" or "postfix stop". </p>

<blockquote>
<pre>
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
    # Default setting for Postfix 2.7 and later.
    # Note: avoid hash files here. Use btree instead.
    address_verify_map = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache

    # Shared persistent cache (requires Postfix 2.9 or later).  
    address_verify_map = proxy:btree:$data_directory/verify_cache
    # Disable automatic cache cleanup in all Postfix instances except
    # for one instance that will be responsible for cache cleanup.
    # address_verify_cache_cleanup_interval = 0

    # Shared memory cache (requires Postfix 2.9 or later).
    # See memcache_table(5) for details.
    address_verify_map = memcache:/etc/postfix/verify-memcache.cf

    # Default setting for Postfix 2.6 and earlier.
    # This uses non-persistent storage only.
    address_verify_map =
</pre>
</blockquote>

<p> NOTE 1: The database file should be stored under a Postfix-owned
directory, such as $data_directory. </p>

<blockquote> As of version 2.5, Postfix no longer uses root privileges
when opening this file. To maintain backwards compatibility, an
attempt to open the file under a non-Postfix directory is redirected
to the Postfix-owned data_directory, and a warning is logged. If
you wish to continue using a pre-existing database file, change its
file ownership to the account specified with the mail_owner parameter,
and either move the file to the data_directory, or move it to some
other Postfix-owned directory.  </blockquote>

<p> NOTE 2: Do not put this file in a file system that may run out
of space.  When the address verification table gets corrupted the
world comes to an end and YOU will have to MANUALLY fix things as
described in the next section. Meanwhile, you will not receive mail
via SMTP. </p>

<p> NOTE 3: The verify(8) daemon will create a new database when
none exists. It will open or create the file before entering the
chroot jail. </p>

<h2><a name="dirty_secret">Managing the address verification
database</a></h2>

<p> The verify(8) manual page describes parameters that control how
long address verification results are cached before they need to
be refreshed, and how long results can remain "unrefreshed" before
they expire.  Postfix uses different controls for positive results
(address was accepted) and for negative results (address was rejected,
or address verification failed for some other reason). </p>

<p> The verify(8) daemon will periodically remove expired entries
from the address verification database, and log the number of entries
retained and dropped (Postfix versions 2.7 and later). A cleanup
run is logged as "partial" when the daemon terminates early because
of "postfix reload, "postfix stop", or because the daemon received
no requests for $max_idle seconds.  Postfix versions 2.6 and earlier
do not implement automatic address verification database cleanup.
There, the database is managed manually as described next. </p>

<p> When the address verification database file becomes too big,
or when it becomes corrupted, the solution is to manually rename
or delete (NOT: truncate) the file and run "postfix reload".  The
verify(8) daemon will then create a new database file.  </p>

<h2><a name="probe_routing">Controlling the routing of address
verification probes</a></h2>

<p> By default, Postfix sends address verification probe messages
via the same route as regular mail, because that normally produces
the most accurate result. It's no good to verify a local address
by connecting to your own SMTP port; that just triggers all kinds
of mailer loop alarms. The same is true for any destination that
your machine is best MX host for:  hidden domains, virtual domains,
etc. </p>

<p> However, some sites have a complex infrastructure where mail
is not sent directly to the Internet, but is instead given to an
intermediate relayhost. This is a problem for address verification,
because remote Internet addresses can be verified only when Postfix
can access remote destinations directly. </p>

<p> For this reason, Postfix allows you to override the routing
parameters when it delivers an address verification probe message.
</p>

<p> First, the address_verify_relayhost parameter allows you to
override the relayhost setting, and the address_verify_transport_maps
parameter allows you to override the transport_maps setting. 
The address_verify_sender_dependent_relayhost_maps parameter
does the same for sender-dependent relayhost selection. </p>

<p> Second, each address class is given its own address verification
version of the message delivery transport, as shown in the table
below. Address classes are defined in the ADDRESS_CLASS_README
file.  </p>

<blockquote>

<table border="1">

<tr> <th> Domain list </th> <th> Regular transport</th> <th> Verify
transport </th> </tr>

<tr> <td> mydestination </td> <td> local_transport </td> <td>
address_verify_local_transport </td> </tr>

<tr> <td> virtual_alias_domains </td> <td> (not applicable) </td>
<td> (not applicable) </td> </tr>

<tr> <td> virtual_mailbox_domains </td> <td> virtual_transport
</td> <td> address_verify_virtual_transport </td> </tr>

<tr> <td> relay_domains </td> <td> relay_transport </td> <td>
address_verify_relay_transport </td> </tr>

<tr> <td> (not applicable) </td> <td> default_transport </td> <td>
address_verify_default_transport </td> </tr>

</table>

</blockquote>

<p> By default, the parameters that control delivery of address
probes have the same value as the parameters that control normal
mail delivery. </p>

<h2><a name="forced_examples">Forced probe routing examples</a></h2>

<p> In a typical scenario one would override the relayhost setting
for address verification probes and leave everything else alone:
</p>

<blockquote>
<pre>
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
    relayhost = $mydomain
    address_verify_relayhost =
    ...
</pre>
</blockquote>

<p> Sites behind a network address translation box might have to
use a different SMTP client that sends the correct hostname
information:  </p>

<blockquote>
<pre>
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
    relayhost = $mydomain
    address_verify_relayhost =
    address_verify_default_transport = direct_smtp

/etc/postfix/master.cf:
    direct_smtp .. .. .. ..  .. .. .. .. .. smtp
        -o smtp_helo_name=nat.box.tld
</pre>
</blockquote>

<h2><a name="forced_limitations">Limitations of forced probe routing</a></h2>

<p> Inconsistencies can happen when probe messages don't follow
the same path as regular mail.  For example, a message can be
accepted when it follows the regular route while an otherwise
identical probe message is rejected when it follows the forced
route. The opposite can happen, too, but is less likely. </p>

</body>

</html>